Plot 02/1 · Traverse
Plot 02/1 · Brief
Context
Maternal and infant nutrition interventions have strong evidence at the efficacy level, but their impact in real-world settings depends on how they are implemented. The WINGS project was designed to understand and strengthen the delivery of nutrition interventions within existing maternal and child health systems, with a focus on growth monitoring, counseling, and referral.
Challenge
Implementation gaps were undermining the potential of evidence-based nutrition protocols. Counseling was inconsistent, growth monitoring was not always linked to action, and coordination across stakeholders was uneven. The research needed to map these gaps without imposing an external frame, describe the system as it actually operated, and identify points where support could improve fidelity and reach.
Approach
I contributed to a mixed-methods implementation research design: qualitative field work with frontline workers and supervisors, review of program data and documentation, and engagement with stakeholders at facility and district levels. Growth monitoring was treated as an implementation outcome, not only in terms of whether it happened, but how, for whom, and with what follow-through. Implementation science frameworks guided data collection and analysis around constructs such as acceptability, feasibility, and adaptation.
Impact
The work produced a grounded picture of where implementation broke down and why. Findings informed recommendations for training, supervision, and data use, with emphasis on changes that could be integrated into existing systems rather than layered on as new projects. The approach emphasized stakeholder ownership so that improvements could be sustained beyond the research timeline.
Reflection
Implementation research in maternal and child health requires patience and humility. The space between protocol and practice is where much of the learning happens. This project reinforced the value of listening to frontline implementers and designing studies that generate insight that can be acted on, not only written up.
Plot 02/1 · Field notes
Lines from the notebook.
They did not fit a results table, and they shaped the recommendations.
- Note 1 Growth charts were meaningful only when paired with dialogue that mothers trusted.
- Note 2 Small workflow changes in weighing and recording had outsized effects on follow-up.
- Note 3 Supervisory visits worked best when framed as shared problem-solving, not inspection.
- Note 4 The system rarely fails at a single point. Follow the handoffs, not only the indicators.